E-Governance Reforms, Organisational Capacity, and Service Delivery Outcomes in South African Local Government
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51137/wrp.ijarbm.818Keywords:
E-Governance, Digital Public Administration, Municipal Service Delivery, Institutional Capacity, South African Local GovernmentAbstract
Digital transformation has become central to public sector reform globally, with e-governance positioned as a mechanism to enhance transparency, efficiency, and citizen-centred service delivery. In South Africa, however, persistent service delivery backlogs, infrastructure failures, and administrative weaknesses in local government raise critical questions about whether digital public administration has translated into tangible improvements in municipal performance. While policy frameworks promote digitalisation, the understanding of its governance and service-delivery implications remains fragmented. This study examined the relationship between e-governance reforms and service delivery outcomes in South African local government. The study was grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model, which provided a framework for understanding how perceived usefulness and ease of use influence the adoption and utilisation of digital systems within municipal contexts. The study adopted a qualitative secondary research design, drawing on academic literature, government reports, Auditor-General findings, and policy documents. A thematic analysis was employed to identify recurring patterns in administrative efficiency, institutional capacity, accountability mechanisms, and citizen engagement. The paper submits that e-governance reforms have improved administrative functions, including financial reporting, information management, and internal communication. However, the impact of digital transformation on frontline service delivery remains uneven due to institutional capacity constraints, inadequate infrastructure, digital skills shortages, weak governance practices, and socioeconomic inequalities. The study further found that digital systems strengthen procedural transparency but do not automatically translate into improved accountability or service responsiveness in the absence of effective leadership and institutional commitment. This study contributes to the fields of public sector management and digital transformation management by examining how e-governance reforms influence organisational performance, institutional capacity, accountability systems, and service delivery outcomes in municipalities. By analysing the managerial dimensions of digital transformation within local government, the study provides insights into how public institutions can leverage technology to improve operational efficiency, strengthen governance processes, and enhance organisational effectiveness in resource-constrained environments.
References
AGSA. (2020). Citizens’ Report on the local government audit outcomes. https://www.agsa.co.za/Portals/0/Reports/MFMA/201920/Citizen%20Report%20MFMA%202019-20%20V8.pdf
AGSA. (2022). General report on the local government audit outcomes. https://mfma-2023.agsareports.co.za/
AGSA. (2023). Consolidated general report on local government audit outcomes. https://mfma-2023.agsareports.co.za/report/mfma_report_2022_23_final.pdf
AGSA. (2024). Integrated annual report 2023/2024. https://www.agsa.co.za/Reporting/AnnualReport.aspx
AGSA. (2025). Auditor-general says state of local government remains dire. https://mfma-2024.agsareports.co.za/report/FINAL%202023-24%20MFMA%20GR%2028%20May%202025%20media%20release.pdf
Badda, A. (2025). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Literature Review. International Journal of Accounting Finance Auditing Management and Economics, 6(11), 459–492.
Balaji, K. (2025). E-Government and E-Governance: Driving digital transformation in public administration. Public governance practices in the age of AI, 23–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9286-7.ch002
Barabanov, A., & Usacheva, E. (2024). The internet and local government communication with citizens and local communities. In Understanding the Digital Transformation of Socio-Economic-Technological Systems: Dedicated to the 120th Anniversary of Economic Education at Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University (pp. 437–450). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56677-6_34
Bhanye, J., & Shayamunda, R. (2025). The promise of civic-tech: digital technologies and transparent, accountable governance. In Digitalisation and public policy in Africa: GovTech and CivicTech innovations (pp. 93–122). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75079-3_5
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in qualitative research. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide.
Bukhari, T. T., Oladimeji, O., Etim, E. D., & Ajayi, J. O. (2021). Automated control monitoring: A new standard for continuous audit readiness. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(3), 711–735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32628/IJSRCSEIT
Chasakara, N. (2026). Integrating African perspectives: A framework for sustainable innovation in e-governance for South Africa Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University].
Cheniki, K., Baziz, A., & Bougdah, H. (2020). Measuring the capacity of local municipalities to adopt an urban e-governance policy using a smart synthetic model. Journal of Urban and Regional Analysis, 12(2), 199–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37043/jura.2020.12.2.5
Dike, E. E. (2019). E-governance and administrative efficiency: Issues and challenges. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education, Technology & Social Strategies, 6(1), 184–194.
Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908
Dondolo, W. (2025). Key insights into the City of Cape Town's data strategy to transform public services. IOL. https://iol.co.za/technology/software-and-internet/2024-09-11-key-insights-into-the-city-of-cape-towns-data-strategy-to-transform-public-services/
Juta, L. B. (2023). Local economic development in South African municipalities: prospects and challenges. African Journal of Development Studies, 2023(si2), 153. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3649/2023/sin2a9
Lindquist, E. A., & Huse, I. (2017). Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital‐era governance. Canadian public administration, 60(4), 627–656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12243
Maguire, M., & Delahunt, B. (2017). Doing a thematic analysis: A practical, step-by-step guide for learning and teaching scholars. All Ireland journal of higher education, 9(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62707/aishej.v9i3.335
Mamokhere, J. (2025). Service delivery conundrums in South African municipalities. Insights into Regional Development, 7(2), 30–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70132/b5776454636
Masiya, T., Davids, Y. D., & Mangai, M. S. (2021). Factors affecting the performance of South African municipal officials: Stakeholders' perspectives. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance(25), 97–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.vi25.7701
Matlala, L. S. (2025). E-governance in South Africa: barriers and enablers of virtual evaluation in the public sector. Insights into Regional Development, 7(2), 84–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70132/d9854558432
Mengich, E., & Onyango, L. A. (2025). Diffusion of E-Procurement Systems: Enhancing Supply Chain Efficiency in Kakamega County Government Ministries, Kenya. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), 9(14). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.914mg00184
Mohiuddin, A. (2025). Transforming Public Service Delivery through E-Governance Policy Analysis and Future Directions for Digital Bangladesh. Transforming Public Service Delivery through E-Governance Policy Analysis and Future Directions for Digital Bangladesh. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.65813/aq/010412
Mollah, M. A. H. (2025). Citizen Expectations and Public Service Delivery. In Service Delivery and the Pulse of Citizen Satisfaction in Urban Governance of Bangladesh (pp. 83–101). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-7564-7_5
Moloto, N. (2025). Leveraging E-Government Infrastructure for Entrepreneurship Development and Economic Growth in Rural Communities: Addressing Challenges and Opportunities in South Africa. International Journal of Applied Research in Business and Management, 6(2).
Namyenya, A., Daum, T., Rwamigisa, P. B., & Birner, R. (2022). E-diary: a digital tool for strengthening accountability in agricultural extension. Information Technology for Development, 28(2), 319–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2021.1875186
Ngcobo, B., & Mbandlwa, Z. (2025). Barriers to the effective implementation of e-governance in the Ethekwini Metropolitan Municipality of Kwazulu Natal, South Africa. International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), 7(6), 204–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v7i6.1004
Nkgapele, S. M., & Mokgolobotho, R. M. (2024). Developing transformational strategies to improve the accessibility of e-governmental services in South African Local Government. International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities, 1(2), 56–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v1i2.147
Omweri, F. (2024). A systematic literature review of e-government implementation in developing countries: examining urban-rural disparities, institutional capacity, and socio-cultural factors in the context of local governance and progress towards SDG 16.6. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(8), 1173–1199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2024.808088
Ozili, P. K. (2025). Technology impact model: a transition from the technology acceptance model. AI & SOCIETY, 40(2), 1–3. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01896-1
Sarifudin, R., & Damanik, F. H. S. (2024). Enhancing transparency and accountability in public administration through information technology utilization. Gema Wiralodra, 15(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31943/gw.v15i1.661
Sharmin, S., & Chowdhury, R. H. (2025). Digital transformation in governance: The impact of e-governance on public administration and transparency. Journal of Computer Science and Technology Studies, 7(1), 362–379. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32996/jcsts.2025.7.1.27
Tahar, A., Riyadh, H. A., Sofyani, H., & Purnomo, W. E. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 537–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no9.537
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view1. MIS quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Victor, D. B. (2025). Successes and Challenges of Digital Systems Usage in Local Government Service Delivery in Tanzania: A Systematic. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.63665/ijemi-y2f6a002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Nhlanhla Sibusiso Malinga, Wendy, Mabizela, Sazi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
