Diagnostic Procedures as a Basis for Organizational Consulting
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51137/wrp.ijcod.638Keywords:
Action Research, Diagnostics Procedures, Organizational Consulting, Psychological DiagnosticsAbstract
Modern organizations face challenges like digitalization and skills shortages, leading to increased reliance on external consulting. Psychological diagnostics serves as a crucial pillar in this context. It offers data-based insights into organizational structures to guide targeted interventions and change processes. This paper investigates how psychological diagnostic tools are meaningfully embedded within organizational consulting. It aims to evaluate the benefits of specific procedures while addressing associated methodological and ethical challenges. The study utilizes a systematic literature review to analyze the current state of research. It applies the action research approach as a theoretical framework. The review examines quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method designs to determine their specific utility and application in consulting contexts. Analysis reveals that quantitative methods ensure efficiency and comparability, while qualitative approaches offer necessary contextual depth. A mixed-methods strategy often yields optimal results. Effective diagnostics improve intervention accuracy and employee participation. However, significant ethical challenges regarding data privacy and interpretation require careful management. These findings demonstrate that scientifically grounded diagnostics are essential for sustainable organizational development. Consultants must balance methodological rigor with ethical responsibility. Future practice should consider digital tools and factors influencing stakeholder acceptance to enhance consulting effectiveness.
References
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (7th ed.). AERA. https://www.testingstandards.net/uploads/7/6/6/4/76643089/standards_2014edition.pdf [Last accessed September 2025]
Bücks, B., & Giebe, C. (2022). Der Faktor Mensch bei der digitalen Transformation in der Pflegebranche–ein methodischer Ansatz für die erfolgreiche Implementierung unter Berücksichtigung gesundheitsförderlicher Prozessgestaltung in mittelständischen Pflegeunternehmen. In Pflegemanagement und Innovation in der Pflege: Wie sich Mensch und Maschine sinnvoll ergänze (pp. 333-345). Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35631-6_25
Bundesministerium der Justiz. (1996/2023). Arbeitsschutzgesetz (ArbSchG) in der Fassung vom 7. August 1996, zuletzt geändert am 19. Oktober 2023. Bundesgesetzblatt I, S. 1470. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/arbschg/ [Last accessed September 2025]Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/735110-studies-in-language-testing-volume-43.pdf#page=53 [Last accessed September 2025]
Cummings, T., & Worley, C. (2015). Transformational change. Organization development & change (10th ed., pp. 529–567). Cengage Learning.
Dériaz, S. (2024). Workforce Transformation: Jedes zweite Unternehmen setzt auf externe Beratung. managerSeminare, 317. https://www.managerseminare.de/ms_Artikel/Workforce-Transformation-Jedes-zweite-Unternehmen-setzt-auf-externe-Beratung,284569 [Last accessed September 2025]
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
French, W. L., & Bell, C. (1995). Organization development: Behavioral science interventions for organization improvement. Pearson Educación.
Gemeinsame Deutsche Arbeitsschutzstrategie [GDA]. (2022). Berücksichtigung psychischer Belastung in der Gefährdungsbeurteilung: Empfehlungen zur Umsetzung in der betrieblichen Praxis (4. Aufl.). Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales. https://www.gda-portal.de/DE/Downloads/pdf/Psychische-Belastung-Gefaehrdungsbeurteilung-4-Auflage.pdf [Last accessed September 2025]
Giebe, C. (2021). It’s A Pirate Tale – A Supplementary Approach To Coaching In Business And Management. International Journal of Applied Research in Business and Management, 2(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.51137/ijarbm.2021.2.1.4
Giebe, C., Wohllebe, A. (2025). Acceptance, Installation and Uninstallation: Literature Review on the Use of Mobile Apps in Personal Coaching. International Journal of Coaching and Organizational Development, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.51137/wrp.ijcod.2025.cgat.45792
Hardegger, S. C. (2023). Psychologische Diagnostik – ein wichtiger Eckpfeiler in der Psychologie. In C. Hättenschwiler, S. C. Hardegger, & R. E. Hefti (Hrsg.), Was bewirkt Psychologie in Arbeit und Gesellschaft? (S. 31–43). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66420-9_4
Harrison, M. I. (2005). Diagnosing organizations: Methods, models, and processes (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452231262
International Test Commission. (2013). ITC guidelines on test use (Version 1.2). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_use.pdf [Last accessed September 2025]
Kauffeld, S., & Maier, G. W. (2020). Schöne digitale Arbeitswelt–Chancen, Risiken und Herausforderungen. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO), 51(3), 255-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-020-00532-y
Kenneally, E., & Dittrich, D. (2012). The Menlo Report: Ethical Principles Guiding Information and Communication Technology Research (Technical Report). U.S. Department of Homeland Security. https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CSD-MenloPrinciplesCOMPANION-20120103-r731_1.pdf [Last accessed September 2025]
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
McNiff, J. (2013). Action research: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203112755
Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (2020). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion (3. Aufl.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-61532-4
Nerdinger, F. W., Blickle, G., & Schaper, N. (2008). Organisationsdiagnostik. In F. W. Nerdinger, G. Blickle, & N. Schaper (Hrsg.), Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie (S. 135–146). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74705-5_10
Phellas, C. N., Bloch, A., & Seale, C. (2011). Structured methods: Interviews, questionnaires and observation. In C. Seale (Hrsg.), Researching society and culture (3. Aufl., S. 181–205). SAGE. https://us.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/47370_Seale_Chapter_11.pdf [Last accessed September 2025]
Saraswati, P., & Devi, A. (2023). Mixed Methods-Research Methodology: An Overview. Mathews Journal of Nursing and Health Care, 5(4), 24. https://doi.org/10.30654/MJNH.100024
Scheytt, T., & Maier, C. (2022). Betriebe im Spagat zwischen Digitalisierungs- und Fachkräftesicherungsdruck. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 76(2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41449-022-00330-w
Schreyögg, G., & Geiger, D. (2024). Organisation Grundlagen moderner Organisationsgestaltung. Mit Fallstudien 7. Auflage. Berlin, Hamburg: Springer Gabler Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43439-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Celina Löser (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
