Reframing Artificial Intelligence in Project Management: A Systematic Review and Socio-Technical Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51137/wrp.ijada.741Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Project Management, STAG-PM Framework, Human-AI Collaboration, AI Governance, Systematic ReviewAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in project forecasting, monitoring, and decision support, yet research remains fragmented and predominantly technology-centered. This study synthesizes the literature and proposes the Socio-Technical AI Governance in Project Management (STAG-PM) framework to explain how AI capabilities interact with managerial judgment, organizational processes, and institutional governance in project environments. A narrative and integrative review of 26 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025 was conducted using a structured search of Scopus, Web of Science, and Science Direct, followed by relevance screening, citation tracking, thematic synthesis, and abductive theory building. The literature is concentrated in construction and engineering and emphasizes prediction, monitoring, and technical performance, indicating that task-level improvements do not necessarily translate into project-level value without reliable and integrated data, alignment with project workflows, effective human interpretation, and appropriate governance. Based on these findings, the STAG-PM framework conceptualizes AI-enabled project management through five interdependent subsystems: data infrastructure, AI intelligence, project execution and control, human cognition and behavior, and governance and institutions. These subsystems interact through AI learning, decision augmentation (DA), and trust-adoption feedback mechanisms to explain how learning, human-AI interaction, and governance-related trust may shape relationships among these subsystems over time. STAG-PM provides a conceptual basis for future empirical research and context-sensitive AI implementation rather than a validated model. The framework positions AI as a means of augmenting managerial judgment while emphasizing socio-technical alignment, organizational integration, and accountable governance as conditions for responsible and sustainable AI-enabled project management.
References
Abdirad, H., & Mathur, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence for BIM content management and delivery: Case study of association rule mining for construction detailing. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 50, Article 101414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2021.101414
Abioye, S. O., Oyedele, L. O., Akanbi, L., Ajayi, A., Davila Delgado, J. M., Bilal, M., Akinade, O. O., & Ahmed, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the construction industry: A review of present status, opportunities and future challenges. Journal of Building Engineering, 44, Article 103299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103299
Akinosho, T. D., Oyedele, L. O., Bilal, M., Ajayi, A. O., Davila Delgado, J. M., Akinade, O. O., & Ahmed, A. A. (2020). Deep learning in the construction industry: A review of present status and future innovations. Journal of Building Engineering, 32, Article 101827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101827
An, Y., Li, H., Su, T., & Wang, Y. (2021). Determining uncertainties in AI applications in AEC sector and their corresponding mitigation strategies. Automation in Construction, 131, Article 103883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103883
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis, (77/78), 345-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/40183951
Ayhan, B. U., & Tokdemir, O. B. (2019). Safety assessment in megaprojects using artificial intelligence. Safety Science, 118, 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.05.027
Bilal, M., & Oyedele, L. O. (2020). Big data with deep learning for benchmarking profitability performance in project tendering. Expert Systems with Applications, 147, Article 113194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113194
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977). MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. Part I: The causes. MIS Quarterly, 1(3), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/248710
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science. 10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Davenport, T. H., & Kirby, J. (2016). Only humans need apply: Winners and losers in the age of smart machines. Harper Business. https://leadersexcellence.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2016/08/Davenport-Leaders-Excellence-presentation.pdf
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Egwim, C. N., Alaka, H., Toriola-Coker, L. O., Balogun, H., & Sunmola, F. (2021). Applied artificial intelligence for predicting construction projects delay. Machine Learning with Applications, 6, Article 100166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2021.100166
El Khatib, M., & Al Falasi, A. (2021). Effects of artificial intelligence on decision making in project management. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 11, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2021.113016
Fang, W., Ding, L., Luo, H., & Love, P. E. D. (2018). Falls from heights: A computer vision-based approach for safety harness detection. Automation in Construction, 91, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.02.018
Fang, W., Love, P. E. D., Luo, H., & Ding, L. (2020). Computer vision for behaviour-based safety in construction: A review and future directions. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 43, Article 100980.
Fang, W., Luo, H., Xu, S., Love, P. E. D., Lu, Z., & Ye, C. (2020). Automated text classification of near-misses from safety reports: An improved deep learning approach. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 44, Article 101060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101060
Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
Gil Ruiz, J., Martínez Torres, J., & González Crespo, R. (2021). The application of artificial intelligence in project management research: A review. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 6(6), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2020.12.003
Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. University of California.
Imtiaz, N., Zannat, F., Vengaladas, M. K., Mahmud, S., & Hasan, M. A. (2025). Transforming Business Analytics: The Impact of Machine Learning on Performance Prediction in US financial sectors. Journal of Business Insight and Innovation, 4(1), 61–72. https://insightfuljournals.com/index.php/JBII/article/view/45
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Khallaf, R., & Khallaf, M. (2021). Classification and analysis of deep learning applications in construction: A systematic literature review. Automation in Construction, 129, Article 103760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103760
Kim, D., Liu, M., Lee, S., & Kamat, V. R. (2019). Remote proximity monitoring between mobile construction resources using camera-mounted UAVs. Automation in Construction, 99, 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.12.014
Martinez, P., Al-Hussein, M., & Ahmad, R. (2019). A scientometric analysis and critical review of computer vision applications for construction. Automation in Construction, 107, Article 102947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102947
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792
Mumford, E. (2000). A socio-technical approach to systems design. Requirements Engineering, 5(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00010345
Munni, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Project Management: A Systematic Review of Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions. Frontiers in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.32996/fcsai.2022.1.1.8x
Nafiz Imtiaz, Farzana Zannat, Sadia Ahmed, Md Asif Hasan, & Shadman Mahmud. (2025). Leveraging AI for Data-Driven Decision Making and Automation in the USA Education Sector. Journal of Economics, Management & Business Administration, 4(1), 87–106. https://www.journals.airsd.org/index.php/jemba/article/view/551
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). A BIM-data mining integrated digital twin framework for advanced project management. Automation in Construction, 124, Article 103564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103564
Pan, Y., & Zhang, L. (2021). Roles of artificial intelligence in construction engineering and management: A critical review and future trends. Automation in Construction, 122, Article 103517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103517
Papri, N. K., Haque, M. K. A., Mouwa, Z. (2022). "Climate-Adaptive Sustainable Apparel Supply Chains: Integrating Machine Learning, Digitalization, and Circular Economy", Journal of Primeasia, 3(1), 1-16, 10730. https://doi.org/10.25163/primeasia.3110730
Pham, H. T. T. L., Rafieizonooz, M., Han, S., & Lee, D.-E. (2021). Current status and future directions of deep learning applications for safety management in construction. Sustainability, 13(24), Article 13579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413579
Rahman, M., Forhad, M. R. (2021). "Sustainable Biomaterials for Next-Generation Textile Applications: Emerging Fibers, Biopolymers, and Advanced Fabrication Strategies – A Review", Journal of Primeasia, 2(1), 1-8, 10698. https://doi.org/10.25163/primeasia.2110698
Raisch, S., & Krakowski, S. (2021). Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review, 46(1), 192–210. https://doi.org/10.5465/2018.0072
Sarker, A., Haque, M. K. A., & Mouwa, Z. (2022). Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable and Climate-Resilient Apparel Supply Chains: A Narrative Review and Integrative Framework. Frontiers in Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 79-92.
Tavana, M., Keramatpour, M., Santos-Arteaga, F. J., & Ghorbaniane, E. (2015). A fuzzy hybrid project portfolio selection method using data envelopment analysis, TOPSIS and integer programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(22), 8432–8444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.06.057
Tavana, M., Khosrojerdi, G., Mina, H., & Rahman, A. (2019). A hybrid mathematical programming model for optimal project portfolio selection using fuzzy inference system and analytic hierarchy process. Evaluation and Program Planning, 77, Article 101703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2019.101703
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Trist, E. L. (1981). The evolution of socio-technical systems (Vol. 2, p. 1981). Toronto: Ontario Quality of Working Life Centre. https://www.lmmiller.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/The-Evolution-of-Socio-Technical-Systems-Trist.pdf
Trist, E. L., & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting: An examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Human relations, 4(1), 3-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726751004001
Xu, Y., Zhou, Y., Sekula, P., & Ding, L. (2021). Machine learning in construction: From shallow to deep learning. Developments in the Built Environment, 6, Article 100045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dibe.2021.100045
Yan, H., Yang, N., Peng, Y., & Ren, Y. (2020). Data mining in the construction industry: Present status, opportunities, and future trends. Automation in Construction, 119, Article 103331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103331
Zhong, B., Pan, X., Love, P. E. D., Ding, L., & Fang, W. (2020). Deep learning and network analysis: Classifying and visualizing accident narratives in construction. Automation in Construction, 113, Article 103089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103089
Zhong, B., Wu, H., Ding, L., Love, P. E. D., Luo, H., Jiao, L., & Li, H. (2019). Mapping computer vision research in construction: Developments, knowledge gaps and implications for research. Automation in Construction, 107, Article 102919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102919
Zolfaghari, S., & Mousavi, S. M. (2021). A novel mathematical programming model for multi-mode project portfolio selection and scheduling with flexible resources and due dates under interval-valued fuzzy random uncertainty. Expert Systems with Applications, 181, Article 115207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115207
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Afsana Munni, Mustafa Alokoud (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
