Adaptive Methodologies and Bricolage Research Design in Africa’s Digital Asymmetry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51137/wrp.ijarbm.429Keywords:
Bricolage Research Design, Africa, Adaptive Methodologies, Digital Asymmetry, Contextual Validity Index, Epistemic ResilienceAbstract
The future of global research increasingly reflects the conditions faced by African scholars, marked by limited infrastructure, digital gaps, and improvisational methods. Instead of viewing these challenges as weaknesses, this paper considers them as opportunities for methodological innovation. It introduces Bricolage Research Design (BRD) as a framework that allows researchers to turn constraints into valuable knowledge. Drawing from African research experiences, BRD is built on four core principles: contextual adaptivity, resource recombination, ethical pluralism, and iterative validation. Five examples from various disciplines illustrate how these principles promote methodological coherence and resilience in the face of scarcity. Additionally, the paper proposes a Contextual Validity Index (CVI) to evaluate research quality in uneven environments. Together, BRD and the CVI challenge traditional metrics that equate rigor with standardization, highlighting Africa’s research landscape as a vital space for redefining methodological excellence in the age of Artificial Intelligence. By shifting the focus from procedural compliance to situational integrity, the paper argues that Africa’s research experience anticipates a global epistemic future in which adaptability and contextual sensitivity serve as key measures of methodological quality.
References
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329
Barter, C., & Renold, E. (1999). Social Research Update 25: The Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research. Sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk. https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU25.html
Blaikie, N. (2007). Approaches to Social Enquiry: Advancing Knowledge. (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Ciambotti, G., Zaccone, M. C., & Pedrini, M. (2022). Enabling bricolage in resource-constrained contexts: the role of sense of community and passion in African social entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-02-2022-0049 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-02-2022-0049
Cilesiz, S., & Greckhamer, T. (2021). Methodological Socialization and Identity: A Bricolage Study of Pathways Toward Qualitative Research in Doctoral Education. Organizational Research Methods, 25(2), 337–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120980047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120980047
Couldry, N. & Mejias, U. (2019). The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503609754
Creswell, J.W. & Creswell, J.D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Los Angeles.
Creswell, J.W. & Poth, C.N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.
de Macedo, J. Q., Khanlou, N., & Luis, M. A. V. (2015). Use of Vignettes in Qualitative Research on Drug Use: Scoping Review and Case Example from Brazil. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 13(5), 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9543-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-015-9543-4
Eke, D., & Ogoh, G. (2022). Forgotten African AI Narratives and the Future of AI in Africa. The International Review of Information Ethics, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.29173/irie482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29173/irie482
Farhoud, M., Bignotti, A., Hamann, R., Kauami, N. C., Kiconco, M., Ghalwash, S., … & Kgaphola, M. (2023). African perspectives on researching social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 19(5), 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/sej-04-2023-0053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-04-2023-0053
Farina, M. & Lavazza, A. (2025). English in llms. Oxford Intersections: AI in Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198945215.003.0140 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198945215.003.0140
Gyekye, K. (1997). Tradition and Modernity: Philosophical Reflections on the African Experience. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112252.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195112252.001.0001
Ibitoye, A.O., Nkwo, M.S., Akinyemi, J.D., Ladoja, K.T. (2025). Afrocentric Trustworthy Framework for Improved Artificial Intelligence Powered Health Management Tool for Africans. In: Eke, D.O., Wakunuma, K., Akintoye, S., Ogoh, G. (eds) Trustworthy AI. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75674-0_5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75674-0_5
Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (1997). Why Focused Strategies May Be Wrong for Emerging Markets. Harvard Business Review, 75, 41–51.
Kincheloe, J. L. (2001). Describing the Bricolage: Conceptualizing a New Rigor in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679–692. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700601 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040100700601
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. University of Chicago Press.
Moore, S., Neylon, C., Paul Eve, M., Paul O’Donnell, D., & Pattinson, D. (2017). “Excellence R Us”: university research and the fetishisation of excellence. Palgrave Communications, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.105 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.105
Muller, J. Z. (2018). The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77h85 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc77h85
Radjou, N., & Euchner, J. (2016). The Principles of Frugal Innovation: An Interview with Navi Radjou. Research Technology Management, 59(4), 13–20. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26586603 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2016.1185339
Rieder, B., & Hofmann, J. (2020). Towards platform observability. Internet Policy Review, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1535 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1535
Rutenberg, I., Gwagwa, A., Omino, M. (2021). Use and Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Climate Change Adaptation in Africa. In: Leal Filho, W., Oguge, N., Ayal, D., Adeleke, L., da Silva, I. (eds) African Handbook of Climate Change Adaptation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42091-8_80-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45106-6_80
Sharp, H. (2019). Bricolage research in history education as a scholarly mixed-methods design. History Education Research Journal, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.18546/herj.16.1.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/HERJ.16.1.05
Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Victor Frimpong, Agim Mamuti (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
