Psychological Contract Violation and Turnover Intention in the European Public Sector: Evidence from Fixed-Effects Panel Analysis

Authors

  • Oloruntoba Oyedele Department of Accounting Science, Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51137/wrp.ijarbm.455

Keywords:

Psychological Contract, Turnover Intention, Public Sector Reform, Austerity, Employee Commitment, Europe

Abstract

In the context of widespread fiscal consolidation and structural reform across Europe, public sector organisations face increasing challenges in maintaining employee commitment and stability. This study investigates the impact of psychological contract violation (PCV) on turnover intention (TI) among public sector employees across 20 European Union countries, using data from the European Working Conditions Survey (EWCS). Employing fixed-effects logistic regression models as a robustness check alongside linear fixed-effects specifications, the analysis accounts for individual-level unobserved heterogeneity and controls for key institutional and demographic covariates. The findings reveal a strong and statistically significant positive association between PCV and TI, robust across specifications. Moreover, the effect of PCV is more pronounced in countries experiencing higher levels of austerity and public sector reform, suggesting a contextual amplification of contract breach effects under institutional strain. These results underscore the behavioural costs of administrative reform and highlight the importance of psychological contract management in public sector human resource strategies. Policymakers are urged to integrate employee support mechanisms into reform agendas, reinforce relational aspects of employment, and invest in transparent communication and participatory change management. Future research should explore longitudinal dynamics and sectoral variation to refine organisational responses to psychological contract disruptions.

References

Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. SAGE Publications.

Bal, P. M., & Rousseau, D. M. (2020). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. SAGE.

Bal, P. M., & Vink, R. (2021). Psychological contract breach and work outcomes: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(1), 102–118.

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Bentein, K., Vandenberghe, C., Vandenberg, R. J., & Stinglhamber, F. (2020). The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(2), 153–166.

Bordia, P., Restubog, S. L. D., & Bordia, S. (2021). How breach of psychological contract leads to employee turnover: Role of organizational cynicism and work alienation. Journal of Business Research, 134, 650–659.

Breaugh, J. A., Ritz, A., & Alfes, K. (2021). Work motivation and public service motivation: Disentangling varieties of motivation and job attitudes. Public Administration Review, 81(4), 620–631.

Breen, R., Karlson, K. B., & Holm, A. (2013). Total, direct, and indirect effects in logit and probit models. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(2), 164–191.

Chen, Y., & Wei, Y. (2024). Education, gender, and job mobility in high-growth industries: A comparative panel analysis. European Economic Review, 161, 104567.

Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2016). Investigating the effect of psychological contract breach on employee performance: Evidence from five European countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(3), 368–380.

Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2016). Understanding psychological contracts at work (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. (2020). Understanding psychological contracts at work: A critical evaluation of theory and research. Oxford University Press.

Conway, N., Guest, D. E., & Trenberth, L. (2023). Testing the differential pathways of the psychological contract on work outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(1), 52–69.

Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., & Shore, L. M. (2022). The employee–organization relationship: Where do we go from here? Human Resource Management Review, 32(1), 100783.

Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., Costa, S. P., Doden, W., & Chang, C.-H. (2021). Psychological contracts: Past, present and future. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 145–170.

Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2021). Social exchange theory: A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 15(2), 606–632.

De Ruiter, M., Lub, X., Jansma, L. L., & Blomme, R. J. (2023). Psychological contract breach in the public sector: An exploration of HR practices and trust in organizations. Public Management Review, 25(3), 359–380.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer.

Eisenberger, R., Malone, G. P., & Presson, W. D. (2020). Optimizing perceived organizational support to enhance employee engagement. Society for Human Resource Management Foundation.

Giauque, D., & Anderfuhren-Biget, S. (2023). Psychological contract breach in times of crisis: Lessons from the public sector during COVID-19. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 43(1), 29–53.

Guest, D. E., & Conway, N. (2021). Employee engagement and psychological contracts: A meta-analysis and review. Human Resource Management Journal, 31(1), 76–98.

Hammerschmid, G., Van de Walle, S., & Stimac, V. (2021). Public administration reforms in Europe: The view from the top. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87(2), 321–339.

Hoechle, D. (2022). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with cross–sectional dependence. The Stata Journal, 22(1), 51–74.

Hommelhoff, S., & König, C. J. (2024). Why public service motivation does not always protect against psychological contract breach: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(1), 1–15.

Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2016). A government that worked better and cost less? Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central government. Oxford University Press.

Jensen, J. M., Opland, R. A., & Ryan, A. M. (2020). Psychological contracts in public sector work: What are the promises and how are they managed? International Public Management Journal, 23(3), 345–370.

Jensen, U. T., & Andersen, L. B. (2020). Public service motivation, user orientation, and employee outcomes. Public Administration, 98(2), 356–372.

Kiefer, T., & Bruch, H. (2019). How emotional labor affects well-being and performance: Insights from public sector employees. Public Administration Review, 79(5), 652–662.

Latorre, F., Guest, D. E., Ramos, J., & Gracia, F. J. (2021). High commitment HR practices, the employment relationship and job performance: A test of a mediation model. European Management Review, 18(2), 103–116.

Leka, S., Jain, A., & Zwetsloot, G. I. (2021). Public sector leadership and resilience in Europe during COVID-19: Psychological contract as a moderator. Safety and Health at Work, 12(4), 457–465.

Linde, B., & Kindt, T. (2022). Public service motivation and contract breach: Evidence from European civil servants. Public Policy and Administration, 37(2), 124–141.

Meijerink, J., Bos-Nehles, A., & de Leede, J. (2019). How employees judge the fairness of innovative work behavior management: A multi-level study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(22), 3247–3274.

Montani, F., Piccoli, B., & Cortini, M. (2022). Work engagement and psychological contract breach: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(9), 1742–1765.

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., Tang, R. L., & Krebs, S. A. (2020). Consequences of psychological contract breach on employee performance: The moderating role of psychological capital. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 27(1), 49–61.

Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2021). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 698–714.

Robinson, S. L., Brown, M., & Zhao, Y. (2022). Psychological contract breach and outcomes: A meta-analysis and theoretical development. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(7), 1129–1148.

Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 121–139.

Tekleab, A. G., Tesluk, P. E., & Quigley, N. R. (2022). Psychological contracts in teams: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 48(1), 210–241.

Van der Heijden, B. I., Notelaers, G., & Peters, P. (2023). Age-inclusive HR practices and psychological contract fulfilment in the public sector. Personnel Review, 52(3), 719–736.

van der Voet, J., & Vermeeren, B. (2021). Change management in hard times: Can change management mitigate the negative relationship between cutbacks and the organizational commitment of public sector employees? Public Management Review, 23(5), 687–709.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2021). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

Zhang, L., Xu, X., & Wang, Y. (2022). Psychological contract breach and employee outcomes: A meta-analytic test of mediating mechanisms and moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(4), 679–699.

Zhang, T., & Nguyen, T. (2023). Job satisfaction and turnover intention in public sector: Evidence from multilevel modeling. Public Management Review, 25(1), 97–117.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

Issue

Section

Original Research Paper

How to Cite

Oyedele, O. (2025). Psychological Contract Violation and Turnover Intention in the European Public Sector: Evidence from Fixed-Effects Panel Analysis. International Journal of Applied Research in Business and Management, 6(5). https://doi.org/10.51137/wrp.ijarbm.455

Most read articles by the same author(s)